Newsletter   Secure Checkout   View Cart (0 items)
 Search: Welcome Guest! Save up to 30-40% on most items with our awesome everyday discounts!

Electron Correlations in Molecules and Solids (Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences) [Paperback]

 Our Price $234.06 Retail Value$ 249.00 You Save $14.94 Item Number 228212 Buy New$234.06
Quantity:
 Available on the Internet only.

Item description for Electron Correlations in Molecules and Solids (Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences) by Peter Fulde...

Electron Correlations in Molecules and Solids bridges the gap between quantum chemistry and solid-state theory. In the first half of the text new concepts are developed for treating many-body and correlation effects, combining standard quantum chemical methods with projection techniques, Greens-function methods and Monte-Carlo techniques. The second half deals with applications of the theory to molecules, semiconductors, transition metals, heavy-fermion systems, and the new high-Tc superconducting materials.

Promise Angels is dedicated to bringing you great books at great prices. Whether you read for entertainment, to learn, or for literacy - you will find what you want at promiseangels.com!

Item Specifications...

 Pages   480 Est. Packaging Dimensions:   Length: 8.52" Width: 3.82" Height: 0.1" Weight:   0.11 lbs. Binding  Softcover Release Date   Apr 25, 2003 Publisher   Springer ISBN  3540593640  ISBN13  9783540593645

Availability  82 units.
Availability accurate as of Mar 26, 2017 05:08.
Usually ships within one to two business days from La Vergne, TN.
Orders shipping to an address other than a confirmed Credit Card / Paypal Billing address may incur and additional processing delay.

 Peter Fulde was born in 1936. Are You The Artisan or Author behind this product? Improve our customers experience by registering for an Artisan Biography Center Homepage.

Product Categories

 1 Books > Special Features > New & Used Textbooks > Sciences > Chemistry 2 Books > Special Features > New & Used Textbooks > Sciences > Physics 3 Books > Subjects > Professional & Technical > Engineering > Chemical > Materials 4 Books > Subjects > Professional & Technical > Engineering > Materials > General 5 Books > Subjects > Professional & Technical > Engineering > Materials > Mechanical Properties of Solids 6 Books > Subjects > Professional & Technical > Professional Science > Chemistry > Chemistry 7 Books > Subjects > Professional & Technical > Professional Science > Chemistry > Physical & Theoretical 8 Books > Subjects > Professional & Technical > Professional Science > Physics > General 9 Books > Subjects > Professional & Technical > Professional Science > Physics > Nuclear Physics 10 Books > Subjects > Professional & Technical > Professional Science > Physics > Solid State Physics 11 Books > Subjects > Science > Chemistry > General & Reference 12 Books > Subjects > Science > General 13 Books > Subjects > Science > Physics > General

Reviews - What do customers think about Electron Correlations in Molecules and Solids (Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences)?

 Think!  Jun 27, 2002 Think! before writing a review and confusing people about cumulants, as the previous reviewer does. Cumulants are widely used in physics and more recently also in theoretical chemistry. Their algebra is very simple, although a bit unfamiliar. Obviously, the "reviewer" Alan Mason from Round Rock, Texas has not understood that algebra. Take his first example: he is certainly right that with his choice of A one finds ¹ c. It is also true, (not pointed out by him) that c ¹ <1opA>c=0 where 1op is the unit operator. But so what! These are well known consequences of the cumulant algebra but they do not imply that any of the equations in the book are wrong. Certainly, they are not. Mason should try to familiarize himself with the Grassmann algebra which is also not a standard one. He should be even more startled. But he would fail by concluding from his surprises that "This king has no clothes". This emperor has no clothes  May 24, 2000 Professor Fulde's primary purpose in this advanced monograph, as stated in the preface, is to provide a unified treatment of electron correlations in molecules and in "solids"; by the latter, he means materials such as metals in which the electrons are not well localized. The basic idea is that since the electron correlation hole is a local object, it should be possible to develop a theory that applies equally well to electron correlations in both cases.First, let us say what is meant by electron correlation. One starts with a Hamiltonian H that describes an atomic system, say, with n electrons; H acts on a Hilbert space S. Pick a finite-dimensional subspace S_0 and apply a variational principle to minimize the expectation E = <\Phi, H \Phi> over all wavefunctions \Phi expressible as a single Slater determinant of n single-electron wavefunctions \phi_i, 1 <= i <= n. The latter can be any normalized vector in S_0; we form the Slater determinant and minimize E over all such choices of the \phi_i. This leads to the Hartree--Fock equations (2.3.13). In the limit as S_0 increases to all of S, E will decrease to a value E_{HF} called the Hartree--Fock limit. It will be greater than the true ground-state energy E_0, because the true ground-state wavefunction is a convergent sum of Slater determinants, not a single determinant. The difference E_{HF} - E_0 has an interesting physical interpretation that justifies calling it the electron correlation energy. This follows from examining the Coulomb term in the one-particle Fock equations (2.3.13) -- each electron is treated as though it interacted with the average charge distribution of the remaining electrons, whereas in fact it interacts with the actual distribution. The effect of this is to overestimate the ground state energy by allowing electrons to come too close, closer than the true Coulomb force would allow. Thus, if we haven't left out necessary terms in the Hamiltonian (such as spin-orbit coupling, relativistic effects for heavy transition metals, etc.), it is natural to attribute the difference E_{HF} - E_0 to this "electron correlation" effect. The correlation suppresses the likelihood of other electrons being close to a given one as compared to what the HF equations would predict, hence the term "correlation hole" and its local nature. Electron correlation effects are of supreme importance in chemistry, because although generally small compared to the self-consistent field energies E_{SCF}, when chemical bonding occurs the difference in the correlation energy corrections is typically not small compared to the difference in the E_{SCF}. Furthermore, the correlation effects are expected to be exquisitely sensitive to the geometry of the orbitals, so we have a fascinating problem lying at the heart of chemistry.The first four chapters give a rapid, somewhat demanding, and authoritative overview of the basicapproximation schemes (the one described above is called the independent electron approximation). The important topics, including density functional theory, are treated. After this promising start, in Chap. 5 Prof. Fulde takes up the main business of the book -- developing a general scheme for constructing localized basis functions optimized so as to account for electron correlation. If he had succeeded in this, it would be a major contribution to the subject. But alas, I have to report that due to a disastrous mathematical oversight, his results are invalid. The smoking gun is Eq. (5.1.20); this does NOT give a well- defined inner product because it is not bilinear and cannot be made so in a consistent, well-defined way. The root of the trouble is the cumulant formula (5.1.15). Let's call the A_i there "atoms" (with respect to cumulant formation). The problem is Fulde's tacit assumption that if the operator Op is a sum of monomials in the A_i then <\Phi_0|Op|\Phi_0>^c can be defined as the corresponding sum of the cumulants of the individual monomials. But what if this expression as a sum of monomials isn't unique? If we write Op in a different way, does the prescription give the same result? The answer is no! Cumulant formation does not respect the ordinary rules of algebra; in particular, one cannot substitute. (I give two examples below.) But in (5.1.20), A and B can be expressed in many different ways as a sum of monomials in the cumulant atoms (here H_1 and possibly H_0). Without a well-defined -- bilinear, positive-semidefinite -- inner product, the entire treatment collapses. This seems to explain the otherwise puzzling lack of references in the literature to the work of Fulde's school; for example, there are none in Vol. 93 in the Advances in Chem. Phys. series (Prigogine, Rice eds.), entitled New Methods in Computational Quantum Mechanics, nor in many other places I have looked.Here are my examples. A is an atom for cumulant formation, and I use only the formulas ^c = and ^c = - ^2.So, let readers of this book be warned!

Write your own review about Electron Correlations in Molecules and Solids (Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences)

Ask A Question or Provide Feedback regarding Electron Correlations in Molecules and Solids (Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences)

Item Feedback and Product Questions
For immediate assistance call 888.395.0572 during the hours of 10am thru 8pm EST Monday thru Friday and a customer care representative will be happy to help you!

Help us continuously improve our service by reporting your feedback or questions below:

I have a question regarding this product
The information above is incorrect or conflicting
The page has misspellings or incorrect grammar
The page did not load correctly in my browser or created an error.

Anti Spam Question. To combat spammers we require that you answer a simple question.
What color is the sky?
Leave This Blank :
Do Not Change This Text :