Item description for Vanquished (Victorian Romance) by Hope Tarr...
Known as The Maid of Mayfair for her unassailable virtue, unwavering resolve, and quiet dignity, suffragette leader, Caledonia —Callie — Rivers is the perfect counter for detractors' portrayal of the women as rabble rousers, lunatics, even whores. But a high-ranking enemy within the government will stop at nothing to ensure that the Parliamentary bill to grant the vote to females dies in the Commons — including ruining the reputation of the Movement's chief spokeswoman. After a streak of disastrous luck at the gaming tables threatens to land him at the bottom of the Thames, photographer Hadrian St. Claire reluctantly agrees to seduce the beautiful suffragist leader and then use his camera to capture her fall from grace. Posing as the photographer commissioned to make her portrait for the upcoming march on Parliament, Hadrian infiltrates Callie's inner circle. But lovely, soft-spoken Callie hardly fits his mental image of a dowdy, man-hating spinster. And as the passion between them flares from spark to full-on flame, Hadrian is the one in danger of being vanquished.
Promise Angels is dedicated to bringing you great books at great prices. Whether you read for entertainment, to learn, or for literacy - you will find what you want at promiseangels.com!
Est. Packaging Dimensions: Length: 1" Width: 4.25" Height: 6.75" Weight: 0.4 lbs.
Release Date Jul 1, 2006
Publisher Medallion Press
ISBN 1932815759 ISBN13 9781932815757
Availability 1 units. Availability accurate as of Oct 26, 2016 07:56.
Usually ships within one to two business days from Momence, IL.
Orders shipping to an address other than a confirmed Credit Card / Paypal Billing address may incur and additional processing delay.
More About Hope Tarr
Hope Tarr is the award winning author of twenty-five historical and contemporary romance novels including OPERATION CINDERELLA, the launch to her Suddenly Cinderella Series, optioned by Twentieth Century Fox as a feature film. Hope is also a co-founder and current curator of Lady Jane's Salon, New York City's first and only monthly romance series now in its sixth year with nine satellites nationwide. She lives in Manhattan with her real-life romance hero and their rescue cats. Visit her online at www.HopeTarr.com, www.LadyJaneSalonNYC.com, www.Facebook.com/HopeC.Tarr, and www.Twitter.com/HopeTarr.
Reviews - What do customers think about Vanquished (Victorian Romance)?
Nothing to recommend it Mar 10, 2008
Didn't like the plot, characters, the romance or the sex scenes(YUCK!). Stupidity, coincidence, dishonesty,abuse deprivation do not a good romance novel make. My first and last book by Ms Tarr.
beware the fine print Nov 8, 2007
I picked this book up because the review promised a novel "sensual" and "rich in historical detail." I found neither claim to be accurate. What is a promising situation (the suffrage movement) full of possibly painful and interesting conflicts (the hero going against his better impulses to get out of a sticky situation; the heroine forced to confront certain erroneous beliefs of her own) never manages to mature into an interesting story. The scenes meant to be erotic came off as painfully banal, the characters read as rehearsed rather than sincere, and the sheer profusion of errors on every level--errors which even the most basic of copy-editing could have cleared up--finally persuaded me that the lack of care put into the writing of this book released me from any obligation to finish reading it. I would dearly love to read a romance that truly is sensual and rich in historical detail, and the chapter epigraphs suggest the author did a great deal of research; maybe the next books will deliver on this promise?
Romance hangover over insecurities and weak male protaganist Jul 25, 2007
In the historical backdrop of Victorian London, VANQUISHED (2006) follows the women's suffrage movement in the late 19th century. I had high hopes and it began with some intriguing promise, but it quickly took a nosedive for the worse. VANQUISHED includes some graphic sexual brutality and some very audacious carnal scenes. None of this is the problem though, the writing and content was aggressive and brutal, and I don't mind that. My problem: for the majority of the book, VANQUISHED highlights a woman's insecurities with her appearance and it's definitely written with a female's sensibilities and desires in mind. After the intriguing opening featuring Hadrian St. Claire's devil's bargain to ruin the heroine Callie, the book then focuses on Callie's insecurities at every turn. It got tired. Old. And exhausting.
I found the Victorian backdrop solid, and the writing strong. The historical details seemed to supplement the story very well. I liked that Hadrian wasn't a duke, earl, viscount or baron. He hails from a poverty-stricken childhood, a prostitute's son, and tries pay off debts as a humble photographer. Regrettably, there's too many things to dislike about Hadrian's character too. Some romance novelists manage to realize believable heroes in love. These believable heroes' loves for their heroines is heartfelt, yet subtle. A bit gruff, yet empowering and very giving. By contrast, in the frequent times Hadrian thinks about his heroine Callie, his love for Callie can only be described by a very suffocating nature. I applaud Callie's sensuality, but c'mon, you have an insecure near-virgin armoring herself with make-believe spectacles, ugly hats and bundles of clothing transition to wanting [...]? I didn't quite see it. I suppose all of Callie's insecurities and lewd desires somehow predicated her public expose in the book's finale, I'm not exactly sure. Some sort of disturbing redemption and fortification of her confidence. Even made it seem like Callie's character journey REQUIRED the public expose.
The ending falls back on some sort of psychological redemption actually warranting Callie's public expose as a device to fortify her self-respect and confidence.
The ending seemed to imply Hadrian St. Claire's compromising pictures ultimately caused the defeat of the bill which would grant women the vote (because despite Dandridge blackmailing Hadrian, Hadrian is at the center of it). After meetings with Lord Stonevale and the PM and Foreign Secretary Lord Salisbury, it seemed Callie was on the verge of pushing the women's vote bill through Parliament. Yet true to the book's purpose, Hadrian vanquishes the bill and her efforts. It's Hadrian who develops the compromising photograph in the first place, it's Hadrian who leaves the developed photograph unattended for the villain to steal, it's Hadrian who fails to retrieve it, it's Hadrian who gets stupidly beat up.
Not only is Hadrian useless, but the thing with the photograph proves he's dumb. After taking the compromising photograph of Callie, he goes insofar as to develop the photograph and leave his shop unattended when he knows Dandridge hired someone to tail him! When he knows that Dandridge desperately desires a photograph ruining Callie! Hadrian-- nice show, sport, just brilliant.
Like I said before, the ending turns into more of a psychological thing whereby the compromising photographs actually served to bolster our insecure heroine's confidence somehow, and she's finally at peace with herself. So having her assets on full display to the world actually helps her emotionally? I know she ignores the ribald jeers during her speech at the very end, but c'mon that kind of thing doesn't go away. After she marries Hadrian, both would bear the brunt of a lot of obscene remarks. Especially considering how public Callie's life as a suffragist leader has been.
VANQUISHED belabors on characters' appearances a bit too much for my tastes. With Hadrian and Callie, it's more about shallow appearances, and Callie's (constant) insecurities obfuscates any potential for chemistry or passion or love. The dwelling on appearances isn't as repetitive as other novels but it also never manages to rise above the common appearance hangover romance novels have with a heroine's insecurities and hero's Adonis good looks. It gets to be a bit too much at the charity ball and then later, in Hadrian's flat. Callie relentlessly drones on and on about her insecurities, too big in the bosom and bottom, too tall, can't dance, etc., etc., etc. Despite Hadrian (constantly) assuring her and lavishing her with compliments about her lovely face, soft skin, curvy figure, etc., Callie persists on latching on to her insecurities. Hope Tarr even uses Callie's insecurity to manipulate Hadrian into taking the compromising photograph towards the end, something he's reluctant to do. When Hadrian comments on her breast after their first time, she again retreats into her shell of insecurities. Enough already, you have the tall, dark, and handsome perfect-guy with a huge, turgid phallus lusting after you and pleasuring you!
I thought Hadrian doesn't do enough for a male character, and doesn't act. I don't mind him being a prostitute's son and hailing from the low, poor classes (in fact, I applaud Hope Tarr for that), but he doesn't do anything. He fails to act when he suspects that Josiah Dandridge has something more personal against Callie. He doesn't do anything when he suspects he's being trailed. Instead of moping around feeling something strong for Callie and anguishing over the devil's bargain he's struck to ruin Callie, anyone who obviously cares for the girl would try to figure out the connection between Callie and Dandridge actively. They would try to discover who's trailing him and subvert him. They would do something, anything, instead of moping around for Callie and waiting for her to come around so you can take her photographs. Hadrian has a barrister friend and if he's too prideful to ask for a loan from the barrister, he could at least enlist his barrister friend's aid earlier in investigating Dandridge and his possible personal vendetta against Callie beyond the obvious. Maybe Hadrian could get his friend Rourke to help with the person trailing him. Something anything, stop moping around and pining! We get it, you feel something strong for Callie unlike any of the other women you've bedded. Now get on with it!
The lovesick notions in this novel are too drowning instead of empowering or heartfelt (at least from a male point-of-view). The ending inundates its readers with endless words of love which didn't seem to ring true as a result. I sure wasn't convinced.
Great read! May 14, 2007
I read this in one sitting. It's a very good read, sexy and gritty.
A few too many errors... Mar 21, 2007
I was really looking forward to reading this -- it promised to definitely not be the "same old same old".... and it somewhat delivered. For my money, I would rather have had more drama with the suffragettes and more info about photography, and not so many scenes of intimacy (which are never very original, and so make every historical romance start to seem a bit too much like the next one)...
My main problem, however, was that this book apparently never had a copyeditor. Error after error started to drive me crazy. There were comma errors everywhere, and paragraphing errors, and lots of weird substitutions. A few examples: "callused" for "callous", "penultimate" for "ultimate" (it *so* does not mean the same thing!), "here, here" for "hear, hear", "Michael Angelo" the famous artist...and many, many more. Hansom cabs in the book have seats facing front and back (they didn't in reality), Oscar Wilde's trial for homosexuality is referred to five years before it happened, and the characters stroll from Covent Garden to Bow in a few minutes (when nowadays it takes about a half hour to get there on the tube -- Covent Garden is *so* not in the East End, or anywhere near it! This is really very basic stuff, just a single glance at a map would show that.)
In the end, I did enjoy the book somewhat...but I can only take so many errors before my brain fries.