Item description for The History of Science and Religion in the Western Tradition: An Encyclopedia (Garland Reference Library of the Humanities) by Gary B. Ferngren, Edward J. Larson & Darrel W. Amundsen...
First comprehensive survey in the field The debate over evolution's place in the school science curriculum in the United States illustrates the ongoing importance of the relationship between science and religion in the West. Surprisingly, however, that relationship has not always been a locus of contention. It has been varied and multifaceted, with religion oftentimes nurturing and encouraging scientific progress. For the first time, this relationship, which has gone on in some form perhaps since the dawn of history itself, is chronicled-through the analysis of intellectual movements, Western religious traditions, and the evolving manifestations of science. A truly vast range of coverage Reaching back to Greece in the fifth century B.C.E. and proceeding to the late twentieth century, this volume describes the relationship of science and religion throughout history. From ancient cosmology and medieval occult sciences to modern physics and psychology, every major intellectual movement and discipline of study is covered. There is also comprehensive coverage of the foundational aspects of the study of science and religion, with, for example, detailed discussions of the demarcation of science and religion, of epistemology, and of causation. Coverage of scientists' religious concerns Also included here are biographical studies of major scientific figures-among them Galileo, Newton, and Darwin-who were particularly concerned with the religious implications and dimensions of their scientific discoveries.
Citations And Professional Reviews The History of Science and Religion in the Western Tradition: An Encyclopedia (Garland Reference Library of the Humanities) by Gary B. Ferngren, Edward J. Larson & Darrel W. Amundsen has been reviewed by professional book reviewers and journalists at the following establishments -
Library Journal - 08/01/2000 page 90
Choice - 12/01/2000 page 685
American Reference Bks Annual - 01/01/2002 page 570
Rec Ref Bks for Small/Med Libr - 01/01/2002 page 213
Library Journal - 08/09/2000
Wilson Public Library Catalog - 01/01/2004 page 96
Wilson Public Library Catalog - 12/31/2008 page 86
Promise Angels is dedicated to bringing you great books at great prices. Whether you read for entertainment, to learn, or for literacy - you will find what you want at promiseangels.com!
Est. Packaging Dimensions: Length: 11.29" Width: 8.88" Height: 1.5" Weight: 3.52 lbs.
Release Date Jun 13, 2000
ISBN 0815316569 ISBN13 9780815316565
Availability 0 units.
More About Gary B. Ferngren, Edward J. Larson & Darrel W. Amundsen
Gary B. Ferngren is Professor of History at Oregon State University, where he has taught since 1970. He holds a Ph.D. (1973) from the University of British Columbia and has written extensively on the social history of ancient medicine, the history of medical ethics, and the historical relationship of religion and medicine. Edward J. Larson is Richard B. Russell Professor of History and Law at the University of Georgia, Athens. Darrel W. Amundsen is Professor of Classics at Western Washington University, Bellingham, Washington.
Reviews - What do customers think about The History of Science and Religion in the Western Tradition: An Encyclopedia (Garland Reference Library of the Humanities)?
A Bold and Balanced Book Jun 14, 2006
This comprehensive volume covers the history of science and religion in Western Civilization with dozens of contributions from leading scholars.
Discovery Fellow Stephen C. Meyer authors the entry "The Demarcation of Science and Religion," where he notes that some theologians have defined religion as the study of God through revelation, while science is the study of the natural world. Meyer recounts how one court testing creationism in the 1980s accepted the testimony of philosopher Michael Ruse to define science as "(1) guided by natural law, (2) explanatory by natural law, (3) testable against the empirical world, (4) tentative, and (5) falsifiable" (pg. 22), but that this definition was subsequently repudiated by various philosophers of science. Indeed, by 1993, Ruse repudiated his previous support for those demarcation arguments by admitting that "Darwinism (like creationism) `depends on certain unprovable metaphysical assumptions.'" (pg. 22) Meyer concludes that theories such as intelligent design and Darwinism are "methodologically equivalent" because "[b]oth prove equally scientific or equally unscientific provided the same criteria are used to adjudicate their scientific status (provided that metaphysically neutral criteria are used to make such assessments)." (pg. 23)
William A. Dembski explains in "The Design Argument" that "the design argument infers from features of the physical world an intelligent cause responsible for those features." (pg. 60) Dembski is careful to explain that "[t]he design argument needs to be distinguished from a metaphysical commitment to design." Despite this distinction, the design argument has often been confused with arguments for metaphysical design or Christian theism. Dembski applauds Elliott Sober's characterization of the design argument as "neither an argument from analogy nor an argument from induction but an inference to the best explanation." (pg. 66) Dembski then paraphrases Sober as saying that "biology has no intrinsic quarrel with the design argument and that the only thing keeping it from being reestablished in biology is the absence of empirically adequate criteria for design." (pg. 66) Discovery Fellows Dembski and Michael Behe have recently attempted to provide such criteria.
Discovery fellow William Lane Craig opens his entry on "The Anthropic Principle" by explaining that it observes that "our own existence as observers acts as a selection effect determining which properties of the universe can be observed by us," for "we can observe only those properties which are compatible with our own existence." (pg. 366) When it is conjoined with a "hypothesis that our observable universe is but one member of a wider collectionof universes" the Anthropic Principle may be used to "explain away the unimaginably improbable fine-tuning of our universe for intelligent life." Thus the Anthropic Principle was originally formulated "in an attempt to come to grips with the so-called large-number coincidences in contemporary cosmology." (pg. 66) Under the weak Anthropic Principle, our temporal location in the history of the universe acts as a selection effect upon what we can observe, while the strong principle "asserts that our very existence constrains what values of the universe we can observe" (pg. 66) Objectors to the Anthropic Principle have observed that "[f]rom the obvious fact that we should not be surprised that we do not observe fundamental conditions incompatible with our existence, it simply does not follow that we should not be surprised that we do, in fact, observe fundamental conditions compatible with our existence." (pg. 366) Therefore, "[t]hat such improbably fine-tined conditions should uniquely exist is amazing, even though we should not be here to notice if they did not." (pg. 367) The fine-tuning of the universe for life is thus an event not necessarily coupled to life's existence, and the fine-tuning must be explained on its own apart from making the mere observation that complex life exists. Craig states that the lack of any evidence for multiple universes makes cosmic design a question worth considering.
In his chapter on "Genetics," Richard Weikart investigates how scientific discoveries in genetics have affected religious views of God. Mendelian genetics were hailed early on as confirmation of creationist views, since it entails the mere reshuffling of pre-existing genetic traits without providing a mechanism for creating new ones. Many religious people embraced both evolution and Mendelian genetics, however, and materialists embraced the discovery of DNA as providing a mechanism for generating new traits. Yet DNA has also inspired belief in God, as the famous painter Salvador Dali said, "And now the announcement of Watson and Crick about DNA. This is for me the real proof of the existence of God." (pg. 479) Weikart concludes by assessing current controversies over whether genetic engineering should be permitted
Writing with Edward B. Davis, Discovery Fellow Robin Collins explains that "Scientific Naturalism" "is the conjunction of naturalism--the claim that nature is all there is and, hence, that there is no supernatural order above nature--with the claim that all objects, processes, truths, and facts about nature fall within the scope of the scientific method." (pg. 201) According to Davis and Collins, "Darwin's theory spawned the widespread use of the concept of evolution to justify various social, political, and religious agendas, claiming for them a scientific basis." (pg. 203) This included its role in "naturalism's becoming the dominant worldview of the academy by the middle of the twentieth century." They observe, "Darwinism largely set the stage for the dominance of scientific naturalism," and that "in every discipline today, except in some schools of theology, a strict methodological naturalism is observed, and typically an ontological naturalism is presupposed by most of the practitioners of these disciplines." (pg. 203) Responses from religious persons to scientific naturalism have ranged from the "extreme response ... to interpret religious beliefs naturalistically" or "vigorously to reject any form of naturalism." (pg. 205) The degree of "accommodation" of scientific naturalism depends on "what is regarded as essential to a particular religion." (pg. 205) Naturalism has caused some Christian philosophers to reject the idea of an immaterial soul or deny the occurrence of the resurrection of Christ. But scientific naturalism is not compatible with "religious believers [who] think a fully supernatural understanding of the inspiration of their scriptures is essential to their religion." (pg. 205) Many religious persons have also offered scientific critiques of the arguments used to bolster naturalism.
This comprehensive volume is accessible and a worthy addition to the library of anyone interested in the intersection of science and religion.