Item description for The Palgrave Concise Historical Atlas of Eastern Europe: Revised and Updated by D. Hupchick & H. Cox...
This reference is a guide to a full understanding of the complicated history of Eastern Europe. Addressing the need for a comprehensive map collection for reference and classroom use, the volume includes 52 two-colour full page maps which are each accompanied by a facing page of explanatory text to provide a useful aid in physical geography and in an area's political development over time. The maps illustrate key moments in East European history from the Middle Ages to the present, in a way that is immediate and comprehensible. Lecturers and students should find it to be an affordable classroom and reference tool, and general readers should enjoy it for its clarity and wealth of information.
Citations And Professional Reviews The Palgrave Concise Historical Atlas of Eastern Europe: Revised and Updated by D. Hupchick & H. Cox has been reviewed by professional book reviewers and journalists at the following establishments -
Choice - 04/01/2002 page 1402
American Reference Bks Annual - 01/01/2002 page 207
Promise Angels is dedicated to bringing you great books at great prices. Whether you read for entertainment, to learn, or for literacy - you will find what you want at promiseangels.com!
Studio: Palgrave Macmillan
Est. Packaging Dimensions: Length: 9.18" Width: 7.68" Height: 0.39" Weight: 0.65 lbs.
Release Date Oct 17, 2001
Publisher Palgrave Macmillan
Edition Revised and Upd
ISBN 0312239858 ISBN13 9780312239855
Availability 0 units.
More About D. Hupchick & H. Cox
DENNIS P. HUPCHICK is an Associate Professor of History at Wilkes University, Pennsylvania, where he also directs the East European and Russian Studies Program. He is the author of Conflict and Chaos in Eastern Europe (SMP, 1995), Culture and History in Eastern Europe (SMP, 1994), co-author of The Palgrave Concise Historical Atlas of the Balkans (Palgrave, 2001), author of The Balkans (Palgrave, 2001), and The Bulgarians in the Seventeenth Century (1993). HAROLD E. COX is Professor and Chair of the Department of History at Wilkes University, Pennsylvania. He is the former editor of Pennsylvania History and has written extensively on the history of urban transportation and the development of inner cities in the nineteenth century. He has created historical maps for various publications since the early 1950s.
Reviews - What do customers think about The Palgrave Concise Historical Atlas of Eastern Europe: Revised and Updated?
The ever-changing Eastern Europe Nov 17, 2007
I bought this book along with the similar Palgrave Concise Historical Atlas of the Balkans. Although there is considerable overlap between the two volumes (since they're both by the same authors), there was enough of a difference for me to choose both.
I am intensely interested in Romanian history ... and this helped me to view many of the changes in this country over the ages ... as it (or pieces of it) were annexed by or lost to the many kingdoms and empires that ruled Romania's present-day territory.
Nice attempt, but not good enough Sep 8, 2002
* * * Do NOT buy hardcover version! * * *
Summary: Maps: ** Text: ***(*) Text-part to be used together with a different atlas. (e.g. "Historical Atlas of East Central Europe, by P. R. Magocsi or Cartographia's "Történelmi Világatlasz" (in Hungarian))
When I first discovered this atlas I thought: "At last a specific work on the topic in English!". Well, despite the range of the maps - 52, listed at the end of the review - it was a disappointment.
First: As all ready pointed out bellow by fellow reviewers, the actual Eastern Europe - Russia, Belorussia, Ukraine - is only dealt with on the periphery. This is actually an atlas of East-Central Europe and the Balkans. Second: The mentality of the text sometimes. "Nationalist", is one of the much preferred word used by the author, especially when dealing with newer history. The difference between "nationalism" and "patriotism" is apparently very subjective. Third: The two first points could be something one could deal with - since a wrong title does not necessarily mean bad quality, and the book is aimed for US public - but now comes the greatest disadvantage about this work: The maps themselves. They can at best be described as of "average" quality, but words like "perfunctory" or "sloppy" could be used as well. There is no excuse for the roughness and distortion of state boundaries, the lack of rivers and cities/towns. And the actual errors to them have yet to be mentioned.
All in all, the map part of this atlas is suitable for very low-level studies of the area only, likely as a picture book for kids (and/or journalists) and the text for high-school studies. It must be mentioned that the author makes a honest attempt to be objective in the history telling, by sometimes presenting several versions/views on the same event, BUT I am sure that this still won't satisfy everybody.
A last remark: This volume shares 14 - or 1/3 - out of it's 52 maps with the "Historical Atlas of the Balkans" from the same series. (Nos. (4), 10, 16, 17, 18, 22, 24, 32, 36, 38, 39, 45, 46, 51 and 52, as observed by the author of these lines.)
The Maps: 1: Eastern Europe - Political, 2001 2: Eastern Europe - Physical 3: Eastern Europe - Demographic 4: Eastern Europe - Cultural 5: The Division of the Roman Empire, Late 3rd Century 6: The Barbarian Migrations, 4th-6th Centuries 7: The East Roman Empire under Justinian I, Mid-6th Century 8: Slavic and Turkic Invasions, 6th-8th Centuries 9: Eastern Europe, Mid-9th Century 10: The Rise of Bulgaria, 8th-10th Centuries 11: Constantinople, 10th-12th Centuries 12: The Balkans, Early 11th Century 13: The Rise of Hungary, 10th-13th Centuries 14: The Rise of Poland, 10th-13th Centuries 15: Eastern Europe, Mid-11th Century 16: The Balkans, Late 12th Century 17: The Latin Empire of Constantinople, 1214 18: The Rise of Serbia, 13th-14th Centuries 19: Eastern Europe, Mid-13th Century 20: Eastern Europe, Mis-14the Century 21: Prague, Mid-14th-15th Centuries 22: The Rise of the Ottoman Empire, 13th-15th Centuries 23: The Expansion of Poland, 14th-15th Centuries 24: Apex of the Ottoman Empire in Europe, Mid-16th Century 25: Istanbul, 16th-17th Century 26: Apex and Decline of Poland, 16th-17th Centuries 27: The Rise of the Habsburgs, 16th-17th Centuries 28: Ottoman Decline, 17th-18th Centuries 29: The Partitions of Poland, 1772-1795 30: Eastern Europe, 1809 31: Eastern Europe, 1815 32: The Balkans after the Serb and Greek Revolutions, 1830 33: Revolutions in the Austrian Empire, 1848-1849 34: The Austro-Hungarian Ausgleich, 1867 35: The Balkans, 1878-1885 36: The Macedonian Question 37: The Balkans, 1908 38: Bosnia-Hercegovina, 1908-1914 39: The Balkan Wars, 1912-1913 40: Eastern Europe, 1914 41: Eastern Europe During World War I 42: Eastern Europe, 1923 43: Independent Poland, 1920-1922 44: Hungary after Trianon, 1920-1939 45: Romania after Trianon, 1920-1938 46: The Transylvanian Question 47: Versailles-Created Yugoslavia, 1921-1941 48: Czechoslovakia and Munich, 1920-1939 49: Eastern Europe During World War II, 1938-1944 50: Eastern Europe, 1948-1991 51: Wars of Yugoslav Succession, 1991-1995 52: The Kosovo Crisis, 1999
Review based on First paperback September 2001 edition.
Woe is the prolongation of the Cold War mentality May 30, 2002
As the first new atlas of Eastern Europe of the new millenium, it is highly disappointing to see that this work has chosen to arbitrarily fix the eastern limits of Eastern Europe at the present-day eastern border of NATO, and leave out the "backward" lands of the former "evil empire". It is interesting to observe how people can at times discuss "European Russia" as ending at the Ural Mountains, but when it suits them feel no qualms about conveniently leaving this area out, because after all "nothing important goes on there anyway". This is just the perpetuation of long-held Western European biases about Eastern Europe (read "Slavs in the Eyes of the Occident" by Ciesla-Korytowska or "Infidels, Turks and Women: The South Slavs in the German Mind, Ca. 1400-1600" by Petkov for starters) which have been further reinforced by decades of the Cold War.
While Paul Robert Magocsi's excellent atlas also stopped short of including the eastern half of Eastern Europe (probably because he wanted us to buy his already-existing tome "Historical Atlas of Ukraine"), at least it was aptly titled "Historical Atlas of East Central Europe". This book's title is misleading to say the least.
One could make a case that the author wished to confine the coverage due to the complexity of the limited area he did cover. However, since the same author has also recently produced "The Palgrave Concise Historical Atlas of the Balkans", one wonders just how much more valuable this work is made by simply expanding the scope to include Poland, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia (and perhaps parts of Hungary and Romania?)
While a good job was done on the part of Eastern Europe covered, this book would have been twice as useful with the other half of Eastern Europe included as well. Thus people wanting to study the migrations of peoples such as the Hungarians and Bulgarians (or the Goths in the opposite direction), or invading threats to Europe such as the Avars or the Golden Horde will yet again be forced to buy two atlases and attempt to piece the picture together.
Also, what is believed to be the area of the formation of the Slavs lies across modern-day boundaries between Poland, Ukraine and Byelorus, and adequate coverage of this topic would seem impossible given the book's limitations.
It is unfortunate that despite all the progress made in the last decade, Europe can still not be seen in anything but terms of its recent political divisions. This cannot help but greatly impede our understanding of the past.
Disregard nationalist lament below -- this book is great Jan 8, 2002
The reviewer below is right that this book rather arbitrarily leaves out what most lay people consider the very heart of "Eastern Europe" (itself a subjective construct): that is, Russia, Belarus, Ukraine, et al. I can only assume the authors did this to make the "concise" element of their title right true. Still, to disregard the book because of this significant oversight would be a big mistake, for the terrain it does cover is done with remarkable clarity and, indeed, concision. The atlas is an invaluable companion to any reading about the Balkans or Eastern Europe up to the eastern border of Poland. Do not let our insulted nationalist convince you otherwise.
It is for US use only Oct 29, 2001
People who did this atlas wanted to cut their job and limited the Eastern Europe by deviding it by two parts. One and very big part of the Eastern Europe is not in the Historical Atlas. The biggest European countries such as Ukraine and Russia as well as other countries - Baltic states, Belarus, Armenia, Georgia, etc. are not concidered to be Europe in so called Historical Atlas of the Eastern Europe. I would reccomend the authors to get some geography lessons before making any other job...